I guess I was just sitting here thinking…WHO voted for this asshole….And then I did some research and I found a few sites stating that people in Louisiana “got what they asked for”….meaning: they voted for Bush and so now they have to WAIT for him to respond.

So I did some research into it..because i was curious to know WHAT states voted for WHO? Because I never really looked into it. I found a website that did an IQ/Politics analysis….I’m posting it below. Please feel free to comment.

HOWEVER: DO NOT THINK THAT I agree THAT THE TITLE IS TRUE. I DO NOT CARE WHO VOTED FOR BUSH. THESE PEOPLE NEED HELP. DO NOT GET ME TWISTED. This is merely a “what do you think?”….”what are your thoughts on what other folks are saying”?

IQs and Politics

FROM: http://chrisevans3d.com/files/iq.htm

Wow, what can I say, in the first 24 hours over 540,000+ people viewed this page! I originally posted this to a few friends on a forum, using information from a list just like this created after the 2000 election. The list was carried by the St. Petersburg Times and the Economist, amongst others. The IQ data was originally attributed to the book “IQ and the Wealth of Nations”, though I checked and couldn’t find them in the current edition, I had posted saying such at the bottom of the table. The tests and data were said to have been administered via the Raven’s APT, and The Test Agency, one of the UK’s leading publishers and distributors of psychometric tests.

I have recently been emailed by someone claiming to have seen a retraction many issues later on the behalf of the Economist Magazine. The Economist could not independently verify the IQ data and the retraction can be found here. I have yet to find any retractions from the St. Petersburg Times or other publications. Here you can find a report correlating IQ and income, and their relation to how people voted in the 2004 election. This IQ data is based on SAT/ACT test scores.
Here you can see the correlation between percentage of college graduates in a state and whom they voted for in the 2000 election.

I think matching census data to the results of the election reveals some very interesting things. For instance, there is a direct correlation that has been pointed out by the Boston Globe between the divorce rate per state, and who they voted for, as it turns out, the higher the percentage of people voting for Bush, the higher the divorce rate. That is very interesting considering many people voted based on ‘values’ and ‘morality’. I am still scratching my head about that one, I was a ‘values voter’ as well, though I value honesty, compassion, and human life.

I am glad that so many people are so interested in IQ, statistical correlations, and their relation to politics. I believe such correlations are increasingly interesting as some candidates this year funneled more money into biased advertising and partisan propaganda than has ever been attempted in the history of the world.

  State Avg. IQ 2004
1 Connecticut 113 Kerry
2 Massachusetts 111 Kerry
3 New Jersey 111 Kerry
4 New York 109 Kerry
5 Rhode Island 107 Kerry
6 Hawaii 106 Kerry
7 Maryland 105 Kerry
8 New Hampshire 105 Kerry
9 Illinois 104 Kerry
10 Delaware 103 Kerry
11 Minnesota 102 Kerry
12 Vermont 102 Kerry
13 Washington 102 Kerry
14 California 101 Kerry
15 Pennsylvania 101 Kerry
16 Maine 100 Kerry
17 Virginia 100 Bush
18 Wisconsin 100 Kerry
19 Colorado 99 Bush
20 Iowa 99 Bush
21 Michigan 99 Kerry
22 Nevada 99 Bush
23 Ohio 99 Bush
24 Oregon 99 Kerry
25 Alaska 98 Bush
26 Florida 98 Bush
27 Missouri 98 Bush
28 Kansas 96 Bush
29 Nebraska 95 Bush
30 Arizona 94 Bush
31 Indiana 94 Bush
32 Tennessee 94 Bush
33 North Carolina 93 Bush
34 West Virginia 93 Bush
35 Arkansas 92 Bush
36 Georgia 92 Bush
37 Kentucky 92 Bush
38 New Mexico 92 Bush
39 North Dakota 92 Bush
40 Texas 92 Bush
41 Alabama 90 Bush
42 Louisiana 90 Bush
43 Montana 90 Bush
44 Oklahoma 90 Bush
45 South Dakota 90 Bush
46 South Carolina 89 Bush
47 Wyoming 89 Bush
48 Idaho 87 Bush
49 Utah 87 Bush
50 Mississippi 85 Bush

 


7 replies to “They Got What they Asked For?

  1. Elliot

    I understand what you’re saying in your point, and at this point, i don’t care who the hell voted for bush, what’s important and i’m not jumping on you because i’ve had to say this over and over and over again. these are our people because they look like us, plain and simple. and it’s a damn shame for some of us to just turn our backs on our own people. but we need to turn that around. yes, it will take a long time to do that but we need to turn that around. i can’t even count on my fingers how many times i have heard someone( who had admittedly voted for bush alllll 3 times and that includes his running for governor of texas) how they are now appalled and upset at his actions, comments, and decisions that have been made in the past up to now. but we can’t say that our own people asked for this and i’m talking about black people. try telling that to these people down here in houston right now to their faces. i didn’t vote for that punk alll 3 times but i can’t say to my own people “that’s what you get for voting for him” it’s time to have better common sense about ourselves these days.

    I agree

    Reply

  2. Frank

    Hey courtney. this is very impressive. I say that the stats don’t lie. The numbers have a way of speaking volumes. plus the folks who voted for bush are die hards to the end. Talk about a group of people that will not admit they voted for the wrong cat. They will take that ish to their grave. They know the real deal regardless what they say. good job courtney…

    Reply

  3. Coley

    Hey CE!!! I don’t .like Bush.. I have never voted for him!!! Plain and symple… But honestly… there’s no sense in beating a dead horse. He is our president (for now) and there’s not too much we can do about that now! What matters now is restoring the areas that Katrina hit, helping the people that were so devestatingly effected by this disaster!… That’s my 2 cents…

    smooches luv!!!

    Reply

Leave a Reply